OCE

Dialogues and Criticism

There Is No Center In The Real - Field I, Point 27

Introduction to the Debate

The text "There is No Center in the Real" confronts the cosmological tradition of centralization - from mythical sacred centers to Aristotelian-Ptolemaic geocentrism and Copernican heliocentrism. The dissolution of the center is not a mere displacement (from Earth to Sun), but elimination of the category itself: a cosmological principle demonstrates that all points are equivalent.

The debate is organised around three axes: genealogy of centered cosmologies, physical development of the cosmological principle, and ontological and ethical consequences of radical decentralization.

Mythical Sacred Centers

Axis Mundi - Cosmic Centers
Universal mythical traditions

Mythical cosmologies universally propose sacred centers that connect cosmic planes. Mount Meru (Hinduism) as the axis of the universe; Jerusalem as the navel of the world (omphalos) in Judaism and Christianity; stone omphalos in Delphi in Greece; Mesoamerican pyramids like axis mundi.

Common structure: sacred center connects heaven, earth and underworld; spatial hierarchy where proximity to the center equates to proximity to the sacred; ontological centralization where center is a source of order.

OCE Review

Sacred centers are anthropocentric projections: humanity is located at the center because it needs symbolic guidance. Cosmological principle dissolves spatial hierarchy. Center is a fiction necessary only for local symbolic systems, not the structure of reality.

Aristotelian-Ptolemaic Geocentrism

Aristotle (384 - 322 BC)
De Caelo - Terra as Center

Aristotle argues: "It is necessary for the Earth to be at the center and motionless, for all heavy bodies move to the center of the universe, which is where the Earth is" (Of Heaven II, 14, 296b). Immovable land in the center; all grave bodies tend towards the center. Natural movement is falling towards the Earth.

Contributo

  • Coherent cosmological systematization
  • Terrestrial physics integrated into cosmos
  • Movimento natural explicado

OCE Review

  • Geometric center = ontological center (error)
  • Unjustified cosmic hierarchy
  • Relatividade dissolve movimento absoluto
Claudius Ptolemy (c. 100 - 170)
Almagesto - Sistema Geocentrico

Ptolemy develops a complete geocentric system: concentric celestial spheres, perfect circular motion, Earth as an absolute reference. Epicycles and deferents explain apparent planetary motions. Mathematically sophisticated system, empirically suitable for available observations.

Ontological implication: geometric center is equivalent to ontological center is equivalent to theological center. Cosmic hierarchy: sublunary region (imperfect, corruptible) versus supralunar region (perfect, incorruptible).

Heliocentrism: Displacement, Not Dissolution

Nicolaus Copernicus (1473 - 1543)
On revolutions (1543)

Copernicus proposes heliocentrism: Sun at the center, Earth in orbital movement. Conceptual revolution: Earth is not immobile, it is not privileged. Freud identifies: humanity's first narcissistic wound.

Limitation

Copernicus only displaces the center, does not dissolve it. Sun becomes a new privileged center. Heliocentrism is expanded geocentrism - it maintains a hierarchical structure where there is an absolute central point. Kepler and Galileo refine heliocentrism but do not question structural centralization.

Isaac Newton (1642 - 1727)
Principia (1687) - Ambiguidade

Newton introduces absolute space: infinite, homogeneous - geometrically without a privileged center. But Newtonian language allows us to speak of a "world system" with the Sun as the practical center.

Unresolved ambiguity: Centerless mathematical space coexists with centered solar system. There is still no physical dissolution of the privilege.

Relativistic Dissolution of the Center

Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)
Relatividade Geral (1916-1917)

Einstein definitively dissolves the center. General covariance: physical laws have the same form in all coordinate systems. Choice of reference is convention, not ontological fact. Any observer can choose himself as the origin - none are privileged.

Relativistic cosmology (1917) allows us to think of a universe without a center. Theoretical preparation for cosmological principle.

Friedmann, Lemaître, Robertson, Walker
FLRW metric (1922-1937)

Development of metrics for homogeneous, isotropic, expanding universe. Friedmann (1922) solves Einstein's equations for a dynamic universe. Lemaître (1927) proposes expansion from the "primordial atom". Robertson (1935) and Walker (1937) formalize geometry.

Established cosmological principle: there is no privileged position, there is no privileged direction. All points are equivalent.

Edwin Hubble (1889 - 1953)
Empirical Confirmation (1929)

Hubble confirms empirically: distant galaxies move away with speeds proportional to their distances. Uniform expansion demonstrated observationally. Each observer sees all the other galaxies recede - none are at the center of the expansion because there is no center.

Planck Collaboration (2018)
Accuracy Confirmation

Planck satellite data confirms: zero-consistent spatial curvature, homogeneity and isotropy with unprecedented precision. Fluctuations in the cosmic background radiation less than 10⁻⁵. Cosmological principle is robust empirical fact, not philosophical speculation.

Narcissistic Wounds and Fourth Wound

Sigmund Freud (1856 - 1939)
"A Difficulty of Psychoanalysis" (1917)

Freud identifies three narcissistic wounds of humanity: cosmological (Copernicus demonstrates Earth is not a center), biological (Darwin demonstrates humanity is not a special creation), psychological (psychoanalysis demonstrates ego does not govern its own home).

Proposta OCE: Quarta Ferida

Relativistic cosmology reveals a more radical wound: there is not even a center in the universe. Copernicus changed center from Earth to Sun. Einstein dissolves center completely. Humanity is not just "outside the center" - it is at any point in an acentric network where centrality does not exist as an ontological category.

Bibliografia

Cosmologia Antiga e Medieval

Aristotle. Of Heaven. Trad. J. L. Stocks. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1922.

Copernicus, Nicholas. On the revolutions of the heavenly bodies. Nuremberg: Petreius, 1543.

Ptolomeu. Almagest. Trad. G. J. Toomer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.

Modern Physics and Cosmology

Einstein, Albert. "Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie." Annalen der Physik 49 (1916): 769-822.

Einstein, Albert. "Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie." Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1917): 142-152.

Friedmann, Alexander. "Über die Krümmung des Raumes." Zeitschrift für Physik 10, no. 1 (1922): 377-386.

Hubble, Edwin. "A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15, no. 3 (1929): 168-173.

Lemaître, Georges. "A homogeneous universe of constant mass and increasing radius." Annals of the Scientific Society of Brussels 47 (1927): 49-59.

Newton, Isaac. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Royal Society, 1687.

Robertson, Howard Percy. "Kinematics and World-Structure." Astrophysical Journal 82 (1935): 284-301.

Walker, Arthur Geoffrey. "On Milne's Theory of World-Structure." Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 42, no. 1 (1937): 90-127.

Contemporary Observations

Bondi, Hermann e Thomas Gold. "The Steady-State Theory of the Expanding Universe." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 108, no. 3 (1948): 252-270.

Peebles, Phillip James Edwin. Principles of Physical Cosmology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.

Penzias, Arno e Robert Wilson. "A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s." Astrophysical Journal Letters 142 (1965): 419-421.

Planck Collaboration. "Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters." Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 (2018): A6.

History of Religions and Psychoanalysis

Eliade, Mircea. The myth of eternal return. Paris: Gallimard, 1949.

Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane. New York: Harcourt, 1957.

Freud, Sigmund. "Eine Schwierigkeit der Psychoanalyse." Imago 5, no. 1 (1917): 1-7.